Infrastructure Issues in the Financial Services Industry: A Case for a Central Counterparty for Data Management

Journal of Securities Operations & Custody, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 202-224, October 2009

24 Pages Posted: 24 Apr 2009 Last revised: 8 Feb 2010

See all articles by Allan D. Grody

Allan D. Grody

Financial InterGroup; New York University (NYU) - Leonard N. Stern School of Business

Date Written: August 30, 2009

Abstract

Collaboration and risk sharing through industry sponsored centralized facilities, i.e. clearing houses, central securities depositories, payment and netting systems, and central counterparties, has been used extensively in the financial services industry. However, it has only been applied to the variable value portion of transactions (principally quantities, transaction prices and monetary values). This paper proposes the same techniques be applied, separately and earlier in a financial transaction's life cycle, to the matching and settling of the non-valued (referential) data components of these transactions. These data components comprise upwards of 70% of a financial transaction's assembled parts. Faults in properly identifying this data, as well as mismatches that occur in separately sourced and assembled financial transactions that counterparties attempt to match prior to payment, are a large source of matching errors. The result is significant imbedded industry-wide operational costs, individual firm monetary loss and counterparty risk, and global systemic risk.

The paper advises that a new facility, the Central Counterparty for Data Management (CCDM) be established to access and match multiple incoming sources of referential data at the pre-trade financial transaction assembly point, "clear" this data through best-of-breed computer analysis, and "settle" (distribute) industry accepted, CCDM assured data sets to participants, making it available to be attached to the variable value portion of the transaction at transaction assembly time. By doing so at the immediate front-end of a financial transaction's life cycle significant improvements can be made in lowering operational costs, reducing transaction failure rates, and reducing operational losses resulting from data failures in the post trade matching, clearing, settlement and reporting environment.

Keywords: Central Counterparty, Data Management, Risk Management, Payment & Settlement, Clearance & Custody

JEL Classification: D2, E22, E44, F2, G2, L2, L5, O31, O33, O38

Suggested Citation

Grody, Allan D., Infrastructure Issues in the Financial Services Industry: A Case for a Central Counterparty for Data Management (August 30, 2009). Journal of Securities Operations & Custody, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 202-224, October 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1393022

Allan D. Grody (Contact Author)

Financial InterGroup ( email )

169 East 69th Street
New York, NY 10012
United States
9174143608 (Phone)
212-585-4397 (Fax)

New York University (NYU) - Leonard N. Stern School of Business ( email )

Suite 9-160
New York, NY
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
259
Abstract Views
1,455
rank
124,197
PlumX Metrics