Institutional Complementarity and Inventive Performance in Nanotechnology

Posted: 25 Apr 2009

See all articles by Andrea Bonaccorsi

Andrea Bonaccorsi

Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa - Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM)

Grid Thoma

University of Camerino

Date Written: July 1, 2007

Abstract

Academics and policy makers are investigating the relations between science and technology in the emerging field of nano science and technology (NST) and the effectiveness of different institutional regimes. We use multiple indicators to analyze the performance of inventors working in NST. We clustered patents into three groups according to the scientific curricula of the inventors. The first group consists of patents whose inventors are all authors of at least one scientific publication in NST, while the second is made up of patents invented by individuals who have no scientific publication in the field. Thirdly, we isolated those patents that have at least one inventor who is also author of at least one scientific publication in NST. The underlining presumption of this classification is that of a proxy of different institutional complementarities of inventive collective action in NST.

Keywords: Science-technology relation; Emerging field; Nanotechnology; Patent quality; Inventive productivity

Suggested Citation

Bonaccorsi, Andrea and Thoma, Grid, Institutional Complementarity and Inventive Performance in Nanotechnology (July 1, 2007). Research Policy, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1394382

Andrea Bonaccorsi

Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa - Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM) ( email )

Piazza Martiri della Liberta, 33
Pisa, I-56127
Italy
+39 05 088 3323 (Phone)
+39 05 088 3344 (Fax)

Grid Thoma (Contact Author)

University of Camerino ( email )

School of Sciences and Technology
Computer Science Division
Camerino, Macerata 62032
Italy

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
628
PlumX Metrics