Mediation in the Supreme and County Courts of Victoria
Report prepared for the Department of Justice, Victoria, Australia, April 2009
256 Pages Posted: 27 Apr 2009
Date Written: April 1, 2009
The aim of this research project was to assess the use and effectiveness of mediation disputes filed in the Supreme and County Courts of Victoria, Australia. The report assesses the use and effectiveness of mediation in the Supreme and County Courts.
In summary, the report found that mostly mediation meets identified objectives. Many disputants and representatives were supportive of mediation processes and felt that the outcomes were mutually beneficial. The report found that there are significant estimated costs savings for disputants where mediation processes are utilised.
Professor Sourdin identified specific areas for improvement, including: improving the quality of mediation processes by supporting excellence in mediation standards; the need for training and accreditation of mediators; the need in appropriate cases for earlier and more targeted referral to mediation by the courts; identifying and addressing the needs of special groups including self-represented litigants and disputants from regional Victoria; addressing the lack of demographic data on dispute resolution processes; and the development of a quality framework to be implemented to enhance the quality of mediation services.
Keywords: mediation, evaluation, research, accreditation, quality, empirical research, court based mediation, alternative dispute resolution, ADR
JEL Classification: L41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Judicial Mediators: Is the Time Right? Part 1
Judicial Mediators: Is the Time Right? Part 2
Are Lawyers Lemons? Competition Principles and Professional Regulation
The ‘New Public Management’ and the Courts
Judicial Accountability and Performance Indicators
Designing Cost Policies to Provide Sufficient Access to Lower Courts
Civil Litigation in New South Wales: Empirical and Analytical Comparisons with Germany
By Annette Marfording and Ann Eyland