Market Access, Economic Geography, and Comparative Advantage: an Empirical Assessment
62 Pages Posted: 22 Jan 1999 Last revised: 20 Jul 2022
Date Written: November 1998
Abstract
The increasing returns revolution in trade is incomplete in an important respect there exists no compelling empirical demonstration of the role of increasing returns in determining production and trade structure. One reason is that trade patterns of the canonical increasing returns models are a consequence simply of specialization, which all theories permit. Krugman (1980) shows that increasing returns models with costs of trade economic geography do allow a simple test: home market effects of demand on production. Davis and Weinstein (1996) reject the simple Krugman (1980) model on OECD data. Here we pair the model with a richer geography structure and find evidence of the importance of increasing returns, in combination with comparative advantage, in affecting OECD manufacturing production structure. The results underscore the importance of market access in implementing models of economic geography.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Empirics of Agglomeration and Trade
By Keith Head and Thierry Mayer
-
Economic Geography and Regional Production Structure: An Empirical Investigation
-
Economic Geography and Reginal Production Structure: An Empirical Investigation
-
The Home Market Effect and Bilateral Trade Patterns
By Gordon H. Hanson and Chong Xiang
-
On the Pervasiveness of Home Market Effects
By Keith Head, Thierry Mayer, ...
-
Regional Wage and Employment Responses to Market Potential in the EU
By Keith Head and Thierry Mayer