Backwards and Forwards with Tort Law

LAW AND SOCIAL JUSTICE, J. Keim-Campbell, M. O'Rourke & D. Shier, eds., MIT Press, 2005

34 Pages Posted: 30 Apr 2009

Date Written: January 1, 2005

Abstract

Here I am concerned with Jules Coleman's challenge, in his book The Practice of Principle, to the attempts of some economists of law to defend, in economic terms, certain core doctrines of the law of torts. The core doctrines in question are (a) that a tort is a wrong and (b) that the remedial duties of tort law (especially to pay damages) are duties to repair the wrong (or the damage that forms part of it). Although I share the view that economists of law typically work with a bad theory of value, I doubt Coleman's contention that their bad theory of value disables them from defending these doctrines in terms of it. Along the way I doubt the contrasts that are sometimes drawn between 'justificatory' and 'explanatory' theories of tort, and between 'normative' and 'positive' economics.

Keywords: jurisprudence, tort law

Suggested Citation

Gardner, John, Backwards and Forwards with Tort Law (January 1, 2005). LAW AND SOCIAL JUSTICE, J. Keim-Campbell, M. O'Rourke & D. Shier, eds., MIT Press, 2005. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1397107

John Gardner (Contact Author)

University of Oxford ( email )

All Souls College
High Street
Oxford, OX1 4AL
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
455
rank
61,139
Abstract Views
2,222
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations while be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information