Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

What Really is at Stake with the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 and Ideas for Future Surveillance Reform

68 Pages Posted: 7 May 2009 Last revised: 10 Aug 2009

Stephanie Cooper Blum

Department of Homeland Security ; Michigan State University

Date Written: May 4, 2009

Abstract

The need to reconcile domestic intelligence requirements with the protection of civil liberties is a recurring and prominent theme in the war on terror. While this tension between domestic intelligence gathering and civil liberties can be seen in many contexts since 9/11, this Article focuses on the Bush administration’s Terrorist Surveillance Program (TSP), where the National Security Agency (NSA) secretly wiretapped Americans without traditional Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants and the resulting FISA reform legislation culminating in the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 (FAA). In July 2008, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed suit against the FAA arguing that it is unconstitutional; this Article, however, argues that the FAA is most likely lawful and appears to be a nuanced compromise between the legitimate need to expeditiously gather intelligence against terrorists and the protection of Americans’ civil liberties. In order to draw this conclusion, it is necessary to understand what traditional FISA requires, how the TSP program departed from that rubric, and how advances in technology and the nature of terrorism have impacted intelligence gathering.

Part I of this Article analyzes the legal framework of domestic spying and discusses the Fourth Amendment, Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, FISA, and changes made to FISA with the USA Patriot Act. Part II analyzes the Bush administration’s warrantless surveillance program and whether, and to what extent, it violated the law. Part III discusses the challenges posed by terrorism to intelligence gathering and the need for modifications to FISA. Part IV analyzes the FAA of July 2008 and ponders whether it is just the perception that civil liberties could be eroded, or whether Americans’ civil liberties truly are at risk. Finally, in Part V, this Article argues that in some ways the FAA has not gone far enough in addressing the underlying problems with conducting surveillance of terrorists and suggests areas for future reform.

Keywords: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), FISA Amendments Act (FAA), Terrorist Surveillance Progam, FISA reform

Suggested Citation

Blum, Stephanie Cooper, What Really is at Stake with the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 and Ideas for Future Surveillance Reform (May 4, 2009). Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, Spring 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1398831

Stephanie Cooper Blum (Contact Author)

Department of Homeland Security ( email )

United States

Michigan State University

Agriculture Hall
East Lansing, MI 48824-1122
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
180
Rank
141,433
Abstract Views
937