A Glimmer of Insight

The Second Draft, Vol. 20, p. 10, August 2005

U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research

2 Pages Posted: 8 May 2009

See all articles by Teresa Brostoff

Teresa Brostoff

University of Pittsburgh - School of Law


In this Article, the author discusses one of her “best” classes, which evolved as legal writing students considered and decided a real case, using a brief submitted to one of the Pennsylvania appellate courts. Through panel deliberations as “judges,” the students quickly realized the advantage of a well-written brief and the detriment of a poorly written brief to attorneys and clients. Students also gained an understanding of the difference in tone and authority attributed to majority and dissenting opinions in cases as each panel voted on the outcome of the case. By experiencing the power of effective written and oral advocacy, students learned more about advocacy, perspective, tone, and professionalism than a lecture or reading could ever convey.

Keywords: experiential learning, legal writing, opinion writing, appellate briefs, legal education, legal instruction LL.M., international law students

Suggested Citation

Brostoff, Teresa, A Glimmer of Insight. The Second Draft, Vol. 20, p. 10, August 2005, U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1399648

Teresa Brostoff (Contact Author)

University of Pittsburgh - School of Law ( email )

3900 Forbes Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States
412-648-2364 (Phone)
412-648-2648 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.pitt.edu/people/teresa-kissane-brostoff

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics