Spread of (Mis)Information in Social Networks

58 Pages Posted: 9 May 2009 Last revised: 12 May 2009

See all articles by Daron Acemoglu

Daron Acemoglu

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Economics; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Asuman E. Ozdaglar

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science

Ali ParandehGheibi

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science

Date Written: May 5, 2009

Abstract

We provide a model to investigate the tension between information aggregation and spread of misinformation in large societies (conceptualized as networks of agents communicating with each other). Each individual holds a belief represented by a scalar. Individuals meet pairwise and exchange information, which is modeled as both individuals adopting the average of their pre-meeting beliefs. When all individuals engage in this type of information exchange, the society will be able to effectively aggregate the initial information held by all individuals. There is also the possibility of misinformation, however, because some of the individuals are "forceful," meaning that they influence the beliefs of (some) of the other individuals they meet, but do not change their own opinion. The paper characterizes how the presence of forceful agents interferes with information aggregation. Under the assumption that even forceful agents obtain some information (however infrequent) from some others (and additional weak regularity conditions), we first show that beliefs in this class of societies converge to a consensus among all individuals. This consensus value is a random variable, however, and we characterize its behavior. Our main results quantify the extent of misinformation in the society by either providing bounds or exact results (in some special cases) on how far the consensus value can be from the benchmark without forceful agents (where there is efficient information aggregation). The worst outcomes obtain when there are several forceful agents and forceful agents themselves update their beliefs only on the basis of information they obtain from individuals most likely to have received their own information previously.

Keywords: information aggregation, learning, misinformation, social networks

JEL Classification: C72, D83

Suggested Citation

Acemoglu, Daron and Ozdaglar, Asuman E. and ParandehGheibi, Ali, Spread of (Mis)Information in Social Networks (May 5, 2009). MIT Department of Economics Working Paper No. 09-15, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1401648 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1401648

Daron Acemoglu (Contact Author)

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Economics ( email )

50 Memorial Drive
Room E52-380b
Cambridge, MA 02142
United States
617-253-1927 (Phone)
617-253-1330 (Fax)

Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)

London
United Kingdom

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Asuman E. Ozdaglar

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science ( email )

50 Memorial Drive
Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
United States
617-324-0058 (Phone)

Ali ParandehGheibi

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science ( email )

77 Massachusetts Ave
Cambridge, MA 02139
United States
617-253-3370 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
301
Abstract Views
3,533
Rank
184,236
PlumX Metrics