Rule-Making in the WTO: Lessons from the Case of Bribery and Corruption
Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 4, pp. 275, 2001
22 Pages Posted: 18 May 2009
Date Written: 2001
Abstract
During the 1990s, the OECD and numerous other international organizations adopted conventions and other instruments designed to control bribery and corruption in international business. The WTO, however, took no such action, and a related initiative on transparency in government procurement has not yet produced any results. This article examines what one can learn about rule-making in the WTO from its failure to act in this case. Much of the explanation for the inaction lay outside the organization, in the political incentives facing major actors. Yet structural characteristics of the WTO, its approach to legalization, and its negotiating processes also played significant roles. These factors should be addressed if the organization is to deal effectively with the controversial issues now on its agenda.
Keywords: World Trade Organization, international organizations, international business
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Government Procurement: Market Access, Transparency, and Multilateral Trade Rules
By Simon J. Evenett and Bernard Hoekman
-
Government Procurement: Market Access, Transparency, and Multilateral Trade Rules
By Simon J. Evenett and Bernard Hoekman
-
International Cooperation and the Reform of Public Procurement Policies
By Simon J. Evenett and Bernard Hoekman
-
International Cooperation and the Reform of Public Procurement Policies
By Simon J. Evenett and Bernard Hoekman
-
Targeted Tariff Preferences to Reduce Corruption in Developing States
-
Foreign Market Access in Government Procurement: Evidence from Japan and Switzerland