23 Pages Posted: 19 May 2009
Card and Krueger's meta-analysis of the employment effects of minimum wages challenged existing theory. Unfortunately, their meta-analysis confused publication selection with the absence of a genuine empirical effect. We apply recently developed meta-analysis methods to 64 US minimum-wage studies and corroborate that Card and Krueger's findings were nevertheless correct. The minimum-wage effects literature is contaminated by publication selection bias, which we estimate to be slightly larger than the average reported minimum-wage effect. Once this publication selection is corrected, little or no evidence of a negative association between minimum wages and employment remains.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Doucouliagos, Hristos and Stanley, T. D., Publication Selection Bias in Minimum-Wage Research? A Meta-Regression Analysis. British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 47, Issue 2, pp. 406-428, June 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1403498 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2009.00723.x
This is a Wiley-Blackwell Publishing paper. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing charges $38.00 .
File name: bjir.
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.