The Curse of the First-Mover: When Incremental Innovation Leads to Radical Change
International Journal of Collaborative Enterprise, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 4–21, 2009
18 Pages Posted: 13 May 2009 Last revised: 7 May 2014
Date Written: May 1, 2009
Abstract
The literature establishes a strong link between radical innovation, first-mover advantage and market dominance. However, there are numerous examples where, despite being the first-mover and radically innovating, companies have failed to achieve a significant market share. In fact, incremental innovation can, sometimes, influence the industry in a more significant way than radical innovation. The aim of this article is to investigate the relation between radical innovation, incremental innovation and market dominance. It explains why radical innovation and first-mover advantage might fail to provide competitive advantage and weaken companies. In order to do so, the article examines the key determinants of why first-movers may face a disadvantage in comparison to followers. These theoretical results are supported by the case study of four products released by Apple, two of which correspond to radical innovations and to others to incremental innovation.
Keywords: incremental innovation, radical innovation, first-mover advantage, digital audio player, Apple, iPod, iMac, Lisa, Newton
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Digital Goods and the New Economy
By Danny Quah
-
Matching Demand and Supply in a Weightless Economy: Market-Driven Creativity with and Without Iprs
By Danny Quah
-
By Thierry Rayna and Ludmila Striukova
-
Understanding the Challenges of the Digital Economy: The Nature of Digital Goods
-
The Economics of Digital Goods: Selling vs. Renting Music Online
-
Extending the Technology Acceptance Model: a Field Study of Broker Workstations
By Henry C. Lucas and Valerie K. Spitler
-
Web 2.0 is Cheap: Supply Exceeds Demand
By Thierry Rayna and Ludmila Striukova
-
Sunk Costs, Free-Riding Justifications, and Compulsory Licensing of Interfaces
By Net Le