The Myth of the Nullifying Jury

USC Law School Working Paper No. 98-17

Posted: 9 Dec 1998

See all articles by Nancy S. Marder

Nancy S. Marder

Illinois Institute of Technology - Chicago-Kent College of Law

Abstract

Jury nullification, an issue that has received much public attention, has been used loosely to describe verdicts with which members of the press and public disagree. One aim of this article is to explain what nullification is and to identify and describe three different situations in which nullification is likely to arise. Another aim is to offer two conceptions of the jury before assessing whether nullification is helpful or harmful to the judicial system. One conception, "a conventional view," largely held by judges, regards the jury as a fact-finding body and little more. My own conception, which I have labeled "a process view," envisions a much broader role for the jury, including interpretive and political functions. Under this broader view of the jury, nullification is not always harmful, as it is under the conventional view, but is even beneficial.

Suggested Citation

Marder, Nancy S., The Myth of the Nullifying Jury. USC Law School Working Paper No. 98-17, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=140508

Nancy S. Marder (Contact Author)

Illinois Institute of Technology - Chicago-Kent College of Law ( email )

565 W. Adams St.
Chicago, IL 60661-3691
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
778
PlumX Metrics