The Slippery Slope: The Impact of Feature Alignability on Search and Satisfaction

Journal of Marketing Research, April 2010

13 Pages Posted: 29 Sep 2013

See all articles by Jill Griffin

Jill Griffin

University of Evansville - School of Business Administration

Susan M. Broniarczyk

University of Texas at Austin - Marketing

Date Written: May 18, 2009

Abstract

This research challenges the notion that increased search effort results in greater satisfaction with the choice. Specifically, we examine the impact of alignability on search quantity and search outcomes. Options that vary along comparable dimensions are characterized as alignable, whereas options that vary along unique dimensions are said to be nonalignable. The results of three studies demonstrate greater search among nonalignable than alignable options. Furthermore, satisfaction initially increases but then declines with further search among nonalignable options. Although choice difficulty is shown to impact search and satisfaction, the primary mechanism driving the inverted U shape in satisfaction for nonalignable options is shown to be feature learning. This research demonstrates the paradox that people continue to search more options precisely when further search is detrimental to satisfaction, falling down the slippery slope of search.

Keywords: search, satisfaction, alignability, assortment, consumer decision making

Suggested Citation

Griffin, Jill and Broniarczyk, Susan M., The Slippery Slope: The Impact of Feature Alignability on Search and Satisfaction (May 18, 2009). Journal of Marketing Research, April 2010 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1406815

Jill Griffin (Contact Author)

University of Evansville - School of Business Administration ( email )

1800 Lincoln Avenue
Evansville, IN 47722
United States

Susan M. Broniarczyk

University of Texas at Austin - Marketing ( email )

2110 Speedway Stop B6700
McCombs School of Business
Austin, TX 78712-1275
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
56
Abstract Views
896
Rank
670,101
PlumX Metrics