Decompiling the Software Directive, the Microsoft CFI Case and the i2010 Strategy: How to Reverse Engineer an International Interoperability Regime

Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, Vol. 14, p. 213, 2008

15 Pages Posted: 24 May 2009 Last revised: 29 Jul 2014

Date Written: July 16, 2008

Abstract

This article analyzes the judgment of the Court of First Instance in Microsoft Corp v Commission of the European Communities, not as a competition law decision but as an important ruling on interoperability. In so doing, this article aims to explain how and why interoperability is not an isolated policy on compatible software in the Software Directive, but is an a priori standard that intersects with a wide array of laws and policies relating to information technology. It is argued that the multiple interfaces that interoperability has with various aspects of the information society constitutes a distinct interoperability regime in Europe. The article concludes with a proposal to use the European interoperability regime as a model for an international law on interoperability.

Keywords: software, reverse engineering, microsoft, interoperability, european commission, international, technology

Suggested Citation

Dizon, Michael Anthony C., Decompiling the Software Directive, the Microsoft CFI Case and the i2010 Strategy: How to Reverse Engineer an International Interoperability Regime (July 16, 2008). Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, Vol. 14, p. 213, 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1407131

Michael Anthony C. Dizon (Contact Author)

Curtin Law School ( email )

Kent Street
Bentley
Perth, WA WA 6102
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
165
Abstract Views
1,088
Rank
307,333
PlumX Metrics