Revisiting the CRA: Perspectives on the Future of the Community Reinvestment Act, Federal Reserve Banks of Boston and San Francisco, February 2009
25 Pages Posted: 23 May 2009 Last revised: 16 Nov 2009
Date Written: May 19, 2009
This chapter revisits a proposal I made fifteen years ago to redesign CRA in a way that harnesses market forces. Specifically, I proposed that banks be permitted to trade their CRA obligations with one another in a manner analogous to 'cap and trade' regimes used to address environmental pollution. A tradable obligation approach to CRA has the potential to enhance the provision of financial services to low- and moderate-income communities. The potential advantages stem from three sources: The allocation of CRA obligations to banks best able to fulfill them; the promotion of specialization in serving CRA-qualified communities; and increased concentration of lenders in CRA-qualified communities. Specialization and concentration could promote cost efficiencies, the amelioration of information-based market imperfections, and the internalization of externalities associated with CRA-qualified services.
Changes in the financial services sector and in community development institutions make this approach potentially more attractive today than it was when I first proposed it. Banks’ lending outside the areas in which they are physically located has expanded substantially; other types of financial institutions not currently subject to CRA now make a high volume of home mortgage loans; and community development financial institutions have developed that could facilitate the allocation of services to CRA-qualified communities.
Keywords: CRA, Community Reinvestment Act, Community Development
JEL Classification: G21
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Klausner, Michael, A Tradable Obligation Approach to the Community Reinvestment Act (May 19, 2009). Revisiting the CRA: Perspectives on the Future of the Community Reinvestment Act, Federal Reserve Banks of Boston and San Francisco, February 2009; Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 375. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1407290