Betas Used by Professors: A Survey with 2,500 Answers

22 Pages Posted: 20 May 2009 Last revised: 2 Jun 2019

See all articles by Pablo Fernandez

Pablo Fernandez

University of Navarra - IESE Business School

Date Written: May 28, 2019

Abstract

We report 2,510 answers from professors from 65 countries and 934 institutions. 1,791 respondents use betas, but 107 of them do not justify the betas they use.

97.3% of the professors that justify the betas use regressions, webs, databases, textbooks or papers (the paper specifies which ones), although many of them admit that calculated betas “are poorly measured and have many problems”.

Only 0.9% of the professors justify the beta using exclusively personal judgement (named qualitative, common sense, intuitive, and logical magnitude betas by different professors).

The paper includes interesting comments from 160 professors.

We all admit that different investors may have different expected cash flows, but many of us affirm that the required return should be equal for everybody: That is a kind of schizophrenic approach to valuation.

Keywords: beta, historical beta, calculated beta, common sense

JEL Classification: G12, G31, M21

Suggested Citation

Fernandez, Pablo, Betas Used by Professors: A Survey with 2,500 Answers (May 28, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1407464 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1407464

Pablo Fernandez (Contact Author)

University of Navarra - IESE Business School ( email )

Camino del Cerro del Aguila 3
28023 Madrid
Spain
+34 91 357 0809 (Phone)
+34 91 357 2913 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://web.iese.edu/PabloFernandez/

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
7,428
Abstract Views
18,320
rank
776
PlumX Metrics