Collateral vs. Project Screening: A Model of Lazy Banks
RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 32, No. 4, Winter, 2001
CSEF WORKING PAPER No. 10
22 Pages Posted: 1 Dec 1998 Last revised: 30 Dec 2010
Date Written: November 1, 1998
Abstract
Many economists argue that the primary economic function of banks is to provide cheap credit, and to facilitate this function, they advocate the strict protection and enforcement of creditor rights. But banks can serve another important economic function: through project screening they can reduce the number of project failures and thus mitigate their private and social costs. Strict protection of creditor rights would leave the tradeoff between these two banking functions to the market. In this paper, we show that because of market imperfections in the banking industry, strong creditor protection may lead to market equilibria in which cheap credit is inappropriately emphasized over project screening. Restrictions on collateral requirements and the protection of debtors in bankruptcy proceedings may redress this imbalance and increase credit-market efficiency.
JEL Classification: D8, G2, K2
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Courts and Banks: Effects of Judicial Enforcement on Credit Markets
By Magda Bianco, Tullio Jappelli, ...
-
Courts and Banks: Effects of Judicial Enforcement on Credit Markets
By Tullio Jappelli, Marco Pagano, ...
-
Financial Market Imperfections and Home Ownership: A Comparative Study
-
The Uneasy Case for the Priority of Secured Claims in Bankruptcy
By Lucian A. Bebchuk and Jesse M. Fried
-
By Lucian A. Bebchuk and Jesse M. Fried
-
By Lucian A. Bebchuk and Jesse M. Fried
-
The Importance of an Effective Legal System for Credit Markets: The Case of Argentina
By Andrew Powell, Marcela Cristini, ...
-
By Fumio Hayashi, Takatoshi Ito, ...
-
The Theory and Practice of Citations Analysis, with Special Reference to Law and Economics
-
Does Poor Legal Enforcement Make Households Credit-Constrained?
By Daniela Fabbri and Mario Padula