Redefining Normative Legal Science: Towards an Argumentative Discipline
METHODS OF HUMAN RIGHTS RESEARCH, F. Coomans, F. Grünfeld, M. Kamminga, eds., Antwerp-Oxford, 2009, 45-58
TICOM Working Paper No. 2009/7
14 Pages Posted: 30 May 2009 Last revised: 19 Oct 2009
Date Written: 2009
Academic legal scholarship increasingly relies on non-normative perspectives. This raises the question what is actually the core of academic legal scholarship and what methodology legal academics should adopt. In this contribution, it is argued that the focus in the present debate should not be on how other disciplines than the law can help us to make the academic study of law more 'scholarly.' Instead, the question should be how the legal approach itself can better match the expectations one has about a truly scholarly discipline of law. To this end, the purpose of normative legal scholarship is redefined.
Keywords: Legal science, Methodology, Normative approach
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Spam Jurisprudence, Air Law, and the Rank Anxiety of Nothing Happening (a Report on the State of the Art)
Reflections on the Nature of Legal Scholarship in the Post-Realist Era
Interpreting European Law - Judicial Adjudication in a Context of Constitutional Pluralism