Who Suffered Antitrust Injury in the Microsoft Case?, 69 George Washington L. Rev. 829 (2001)
31 Pages Posted: 30 May 2009
Date Written: May 29, 2009
This article, published in 2001, shortly after the D.C. Circuit's decision in the Microsoft case, considers which classes of plaintiffs might have suffered antitrust injury as a result of Microsoft's illegal conduct. We suggest that consumers, computer manufacturers, and competitors, particularly Netscape, would all face significant challenges in proving that they were harmed either by an illegal overcharge or by inefficiently exclusionary conduct.
Keywords: antitrust, Microsoft, monopolization, antitrust injury, damages
JEL Classification: I41, l42, K21, K41, K42
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Lopatka, John E. and Page, William H., Who Suffered Antitrust Injury in the the Microsoft Case? (May 29, 2009). Who Suffered Antitrust Injury in the Microsoft Case?, 69 George Washington L. Rev. 829 (2001); George Washington Law Review, Vol. 69, 2001. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1411783