Why We Really Need the Arbitration Fairness Act: It's All About Separation of Powers

Journal of Consumer & Commercial Law, Vol. 12, p. 151, 2009

U of Houston Law Center No. 2009-A-15

15 Pages Posted: 30 May 2009  

Richard M. Alderman

University of Houston Law Center

Date Written: May 29, 2009

Abstract

Congress is currently considering the Arbitration Fairness Act, which prohibits pre-dispute mandatory arbitration clauses in consumer contracts. This article reviews the use of consumer arbitration to demonstrate that in consumer cases arbitration is used to eliminate consumer disputes, not to provide an efficient alternative forum. More importantly, it is suggested that the widespread, in fact near universal, use of consumer arbitration conflicts with the core American belief in separation of powers. Through arbitration, business can effectively divorce itself from the civil justice system, eliminating the judicial branch from consumer disputes. The only way to reverse this dangerous trend is through the prohibition contained in the Arbitration Fairness Act.

Keywords: Consumer, arbitration, Civil Justice

Suggested Citation

Alderman, Richard M., Why We Really Need the Arbitration Fairness Act: It's All About Separation of Powers (May 29, 2009). Journal of Consumer & Commercial Law, Vol. 12, p. 151, 2009; U of Houston Law Center No. 2009-A-15. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1411868

Richard M. Alderman (Contact Author)

University of Houston Law Center ( email )

4604 Calhoun Road
Houston, TX 77204-6060
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
304
Rank
80,029
Abstract Views
1,581