Do Endowments Predict the Location of Production? Evidence from National and International Data
76 Pages Posted: 16 Mar 1999 Last revised: 17 Aug 2022
Date Written: November 1998
Abstract
Examining the relationship between factor endowments and production patterns using international and Japanese regional data, we provide the first empirical confirmation of Ethier's correlation approach to the Rybczynski theorem. Moreover, we find evidence of substantial production indeterminacy. Prediction errors are six to thirty times larger for goods traded relatively freely. A compelling explanation of this phenomenon is the existence of more goods than factors in the presence of trade costs. This result implies that regressions of trade or output on endowments have weak theoretical foundations. Furthermore, since errors are largest in data sets where trade costs are small, we explain why the common methodology of imputing trade barriers from regression residuals often leads to backwards results.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Technology, Factor Supplies and International Specialization: Estimating the Neoclassical Model
-
One Size Fits All? Heckscher-Ohlin Specialization in Global Production
-
The Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek Model of Trade: Why Does it Fail? When Does it Work?
By Donald R. Davis, David E. Weinstein, ...
-
Increasing Returns and All that: A View from Trade
By Werner Antweiler and Daniel Trefler
-
Estimation of Cross-Country Differences in Industry Production Functions
-
Specialization and the Volume of Trade: Do the Data Obey the Laws?
-
Specialization and the Volume of Trade: Do the Data Obey the Laws?