A Conceptual Analysis of State Support for Higher Education: Appropriations versus Need-Based Financial Aid

Research in Higher Education, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 40-64

44 Pages Posted: 31 May 2009 Last revised: 10 Apr 2011

See all articles by Robert K. Toutkoushian

Robert K. Toutkoushian

School of Education, Indiana University

M. Najeeb Shafiq

University of Pittsburgh

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: 2010

Abstract

In this paper, we use economic concepts to examine the choice that states make between giving appropriations to public colleges or need-based financial aid to students. We begin by reviewing the economic justification for state support for higher education. Next, we introduce a simple economic model for comparing and contrasting appropriations and need-based aid for supporting higher education. We then provide a graphical depiction of the model and simulate the effects of each policy on access to higher education. We show that it is in the best interest of states to provide need-based aid and not appropriations. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of the factors that complicate the reallocation of state funding away from appropriations and towards need-based aid.

Keywords: appropriations, education finance, higher education, economics of education, need-based financial aid

JEL Classification: D78, H23, H39, H40, H52, H70, I2, I3, J18

Suggested Citation

Toutkoushian, Robert K. and Shafiq, M. Najeeb, A Conceptual Analysis of State Support for Higher Education: Appropriations versus Need-Based Financial Aid (2010). Research in Higher Education, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 40-64, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1412054

Robert K. Toutkoushian

School of Education, Indiana University ( email )

IN
United States

M. Najeeb Shafiq (Contact Author)

University of Pittsburgh ( email )

135 N Bellefield Ave
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.pitt.edu/~mnshafiq

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
102
Abstract Views
1,067
rank
193,299
PlumX Metrics