An Examination of the Impact of Stimuli Type and Gss Structure on Creativity: Brainstorming Versus Non-Brainstorming Techniques in a Gss Environment

Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 59-85, Spring 2002

42 Pages Posted: 5 Jun 2009 Last revised: 5 Nov 2014

See all articles by Jill Hender

Jill Hender

University of Reading - Department of Management

Douglas L. Dean

Brigham Young University - Information Systems Department

Tom Rodgers

Texas A&M University

Jay F. Nunamaker

University of Arizona - Center for the Management of Information (CMI)

Date Written: April 1, 2002

Abstract

Of the techniques available for idea generation with group support systems (GSS), little research attention has been given to techniques that challenge problem assumptions or that use unrelated stimuli to promote creativity. When implementing such techniques with GSS, choices must be made regarding how to configure the GSS to deploy the initial creative stimuli and to present the pool of emerging ideas that act as additional stimuli. This paper reports the results of an experiment that compares Electronic Brainstorming (few unnamed rotating dialogues) with Assumption Reversals (many related stimuli, many named dialogues, free movement among dialogues) and Analogies (many unrelated stimuli, many named dialogues, free movement among dialogues). Analogies produced creative, but fewer, ideas, due to the use of unrelated stimuli. Assumption Reversals produced the most, but less creative, ideas, possibly due to fragmentation of the group memory and cognitive inertia caused by lack of forced movement among dialogues.

Keywords: GSS, creativity, creative methods, electronic meeting systems

Suggested Citation

Hender, Jill and Dean, Douglas L. and Rodgers, Tom and Nunamaker, Jay F., An Examination of the Impact of Stimuli Type and Gss Structure on Creativity: Brainstorming Versus Non-Brainstorming Techniques in a Gss Environment (April 1, 2002). Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 59-85, Spring 2002, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1413365

Jill Hender

University of Reading - Department of Management ( email )

United Kingdom

Douglas L. Dean (Contact Author)

Brigham Young University - Information Systems Department ( email )

786 Tanner Building
Marriott School
Provo, UT 84602
United States
801-422-3247 (Phone)
801-422-0573 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://isys.byu.edu/

Tom Rodgers

Texas A&M University ( email )

Langford Building A
798 Ross St.
College Station, TX 77843-3137
United States

Jay F. Nunamaker

University of Arizona - Center for the Management of Information (CMI) ( email )

McClelland Hall 202
P.O. Box 210108
Tucson, AZ 85721-0108
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
46
Abstract Views
658
PlumX Metrics