10 Pages Posted: 10 Jun 2009
This note provides an introduction to moral relativism, discusses the various ways it poses fundamental challenges to engaging in ethical reflection, and offers alternative ways of thinking about ethics that avoid the trap of relativism.
January 12, 2009
Making morally defensible decisions requires balancing tolerance and resolve. Moral relativism and moral absolutism offer managers a “free pass” from the critical thinking and reasoning necessary in making well-balanced decisions. The rapidly increasing global scale of business requires that executives be prepared to confront a variety of situations in which they must determine what is ethically right and wrong. This note identifies and analyzes a few of the conceptual traps caused by relativist thinking and offers guidance on how to avoid these traps.
What Is Moral Relativism?
Moral relativism is a view about the scope of our values and beliefs. In essence, moral relativism holds that claims about what is right and wrong are relative to individual, social, and cultural boundaries; therefore one cannot judge what is right and wrong outside those individual, social, and cultural boundaries.
. . .
Keywords: ethics, relativism, decision making, ethical theory
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Register to save articles to
This is a Darden A Case paper. Darden A Case charges $6.25 .
File name: UVA-E-0341.pdf
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.