Visions of Deception: Neuroimages and the Search for Truth
25 Pages Posted: 18 Jun 2009
Date Written: June 17, 2009
The historical use of science in the search for truth has posed consistent evidentiary problems of definition, causation, validity, accuracy, inferential conclusions unsupported by data, and complications of real-world applications. As the Innocence Project exoneration data show and the National Academy of Science Report on Forensic Science suggest, our reach in this area may well exceed our grasp. This article argues that the neuroimaging of deception - focusing primarily on the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies done to date - may well include all of these problems. This symposium article reviews briefly the types of neuroimaging used to detect deception, describes some of the specific criticisms leveled at the science, and explains why these small group of studies are not yet courtroom-ready. Arguing that the studies meet neither the general acceptance nor reliability standards of evidence, the article urges courts to act with restraint, allowing time for further studies, further robust criticism of the studies, additional replication studies, and sufficient time for moral, ethical, and jurisprudential rumination about whether the legal system really wants this type of evidence.
Keywords: evidence, neuroscience, fMRI
JEL Classification: K1
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
By Owen D. Jones, Jeffrey D. Schall, ...
By Owen D. Jones, Rene Marois, ...
Danger at the Edge of Chaos: Predicting Violent Behavior in a Post-Daubert World
Letting Katz Out of the Bag: Cognitive Freedom and Fourth Amendment Fidelity
Violence on the Brain: A Critique of Neuroscience in Criminal Law
Brain Imaging and the Bill of Rights
By Dov Fox
By Douglas A. Berman and Stephanos Bibas
The Disordered and Discredited Plaintiff: Psychiatric Evidence in Civil Litigation