Protest, Proportionality and the Politics of Privacy

Albert, Richard

Download This Paper

Open PDF in Browser

Add Paper to My Library

Protest, Proportionality and the Politics of Privacy

27 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 1 (2005)

62 Pages Posted: 29 Jun 2009 Last revised: 15 Sep 2017

See all articles by Richard Albert

Richard Albert

University of Texas at Austin - School of Law; University of Texas at Austin - Department of Government; Université Paris II - Panthéon-Assas; Universidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo; Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Derecho; São Paulo Law School of Fundação Getulio Vargas FGV DIREITO SP; University of Toronto - Faculty of Law; University of Ottawa - Faculty of Law; Reichman University - Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliyah - Harry Radziner School of Law; Airlangga University; Yale University; Maharashtra National Law University Mumbai

Date Written: 2005

Abstract

This Article is an exercise in comparative constitutional law and politics. It is both descriptive and analytical. It explores how - and explains why - Canada and the United States have mediated the tension between the right of access to abortion clinics and the freedom of religious expression. It also illuminates why both nations have privileged the right of access to abortion clinics over the right to free religious expression.

Keywords: Privacy, Religion, Religious Expression, Abortion, Canada, United States, Comparative Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law, Comparative Law, Proportionality, Abortion Clinics

Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation

Albert, Richard, Protest, Proportionality and the Politics of Privacy (2005). 27 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 1 (2005), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1424042