49 Pages Posted: 28 Jun 2009 Last revised: 16 Mar 2010
Date Written: 2009
No question of constitutional design is more intensely debated than whether emerging democracies should adopt presidential or parliamentary systems. This is an important debate but it misses a critical point about constitutional design - namely that the structural differences between presidentialism and parliamentarism conceal much more than they reveal. In this Article, I demonstrate precisely how conventional accounts of the structural differences between presidentialism and parliamentarism actually obscure their functional similarities.
Keywords: presidentialism, parliamentarism, constitutional design, efficiency, electoral systems, separation of powers, fusion of powers
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Albert, Richard, The Fusion of Presidentialism and Parliamentarism (2009). American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 57, No. 3, 2009; Boston College Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 190. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1424084