Why Law Students Should Take the Federal Courts Course

Saint Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 53, pp. 745-760, 2009

Saint Louis U. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009-05

17 Pages Posted: 1 Jul 2009  

Roger L. Goldman

Saint Louis University - School of Law

Date Written: 2009

Abstract

The most unique feature of the American judiciary is its dual system of trial courts, one state and one federal. This article explores the reasons traditionally given for the need for lower federal courts and whether, in practice, the federal courts are actually serving those needs. For example, it has been assumed that state courts are less hospitable to federal civil rights and consumer claims than federal courts, yet in many jurisdictions, plaintiffs’ lawyers prefer filing claims in state courts under state anti-discrimination or consumer laws rather than federal laws to prevent removal of the case to federal court. The article encourages third-year law students to take this capstone course because of its unique blend of the highly theoretical with the very practical questions facing any lawyer in deciding whether to file in - or remove to - federal court.

Keywords: federal courts, state vs. federal courts

Suggested Citation

Goldman, Roger L., Why Law Students Should Take the Federal Courts Course (2009). Saint Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 53, pp. 745-760, 2009; Saint Louis U. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009-05. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1425602

Roger L. Goldman (Contact Author)

Saint Louis University - School of Law ( email )

100 N. Tucker Blvd.
St. Louis, MO 63101
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
113
Rank
200,459
Abstract Views
945