Civil Liability at Common Law for Wrongful Death: A Footnote to the Dictum of Lord Denman in O'Connell v. The Queen

9 Pages Posted: 11 Jul 2009  

Malcolm S. Mason

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: July 9, 2009

Abstract

Since the enactment in Britain of Lord Campbell’s Act (The Wrongful Death Act) (1846) it has been widely but erroneously assumed that the Common Law provided no civil remedy for wrongful death. This mistaken view is sometimes thought to rest on the maxim, Actio personalis moritur cum persona, or on the thought that the value of a human life is beyond estimation, or on the doctrine of merger in felony, or on the obsolete right of appeal, or on the need of a contract. None of these justify the belief in lack of civil remedy at common law. The common practice of American courts, including some made up of learned lawyers, shows the contrary. If we now return to a close examination of the English precedents, we find the existence of the remedy confirmed. Why was the mistaken view accepted. Speculatively, it was because of the rise of railroad accidents and of Lord Campbell’s gifts as an orator which exceeded his gifts as a lawyer.

Keywords: legal history, wrongful death

Suggested Citation

Mason, Malcolm S., Civil Liability at Common Law for Wrongful Death: A Footnote to the Dictum of Lord Denman in O'Connell v. The Queen (July 9, 2009). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1431922 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1431922

Malcolm S. Mason (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Paper statistics

Downloads
111
Rank
198,682
Abstract Views
695