Checks and Balances on Political Budget Cycles: Cross-Country Evidence
22 Pages Posted: 9 Jul 2009
Abstract
Previous empirical work on political budget cycles (PBCs) implicitly assumes the executive has full discretion over fiscal policy. Instead, we ask what happens when legislative checks and balances limit executive discretion. We find that legislative checks and balances moderate PBCs in countries with high compliance with the law. More effective checks and balances help to explain why cycles are weaker in developed countries and in established democracies. When the discretional component of executive power is isolated, there are significant cycles in all democracies.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Political Budget Cycles in New Versus Established Democracies
By Adi Brender and Allan Drazen
-
Political Budget Cycles in New Versus Established Democracies
By Adi Brender and Allan Drazen
-
Political Business Cycles and Expenditure Policies in Developing Countries
-
Opportunistic Political Cycles: Test in a Young Democracy Setting
By Akhmed Akhmedov, Alexei Ravichev, ...
-
Fiscal Transparency, Political Parties, and Debt in OECD Countries
By David Dreyer Lassen and James E. Alt
-
Conditional Political Budget Cycles
By Min Shi and Jakob Svensson
-
By Adi Brender and Allan Drazen
-
Do Changes in Democracy Affect the Political Budget Cycle? Evidence from Mexico
Checks and Balances on Political Budget Cycles: Cross-Country Evidence
This is a Wiley-Blackwell Publishing paper. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing charges $42.00 .
File name: kykl.pdf
Size: 205K
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.
