Comments on Carried Interest Bill (H.R. 1935)

6 Pages Posted: 14 Jul 2009 Last revised: 11 Sep 2015

See all articles by Karen C. Burke

Karen C. Burke

University of Florida Levin College of Law

Date Written: July 10, 2009

Abstract

This letter offers comments on two proposed statutory changes currently set forth in H.R. 1935: (1) new section 710, which would tax the compensatory component of certain 'carried interests' as ordinary income; and (2) a related amendment to section 83(b) concerning transfers of partnership interests in connection with services. The discussion proceeds in three parts. The first part provides an overall comparison of the joint-tax benefits of alternative forms of equity compensation (profits interests and compensatory options) under current law and section 710. The second part suggests a drafting clarification and discusses the operation of the qualified capital exception when profits are taxed and reinvested in the partnership. The third part proposes a more limited approach to the interaction between sections 83 and 710. A brief conclusion suggests that the problems posed by carried interests can be addressed more effectively and less disruptively by a narrowly targeted solution within the framework of current law.

Keywords: carried interests, proposed 710, H.R. 1935, deferred compensation, profits interest, 83, 409A, 457A, qualified capital exception, ARSA options, DRIP treatment, joint-tax advantage, liquidation value

JEL Classification: K34

Suggested Citation

Burke, Karen C., Comments on Carried Interest Bill (H.R. 1935) (July 10, 2009). San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 09-022, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1432548 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1432548

Karen C. Burke (Contact Author)

University of Florida Levin College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 117625
Gainesville, FL 32611-7625
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
147
Abstract Views
875
rank
221,437
PlumX Metrics