A Common Lawyer’s Perspective on the European Perspective on Punitive Damages

21 Pages Posted: 10 Jul 2009  

Michael Lewis Wells

University of Georgia Law School

Date Written: July 1, 2009

Abstract

Punitive damages are generally available in common law jurisdictions, but are disfavored in civil law systems. This paper argues that the main reasons for the difference are historical and cultural. Roman law and the French Revolution heaviliy influenced the civil law. Civilians were taught that legal development comes from the top down. They learned to treat law as a system of general principles and to resist anomalies. They found it relatively easy to reject the intrusion of criminal themes into private law. The common law developed one case at a time, with no particular emphasis on systematic coherence. It was comparatively easy for lawyers to convince judges that juries in tort cases should be allowed to punish defendants for egregious misconduct.

Keywords: Punitive damages, common vs. civil law, comparative legal history

JEL Classification: K13

Suggested Citation

Wells, Michael Lewis, A Common Lawyer’s Perspective on the European Perspective on Punitive Damages (July 1, 2009). University of Georgia School of Law Legal Studies Research No. 09-11; Louisiana Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1432574

Michael Lewis Wells (Contact Author)

University of Georgia Law School ( email )

225 Herty Drive
Athens, GA 30602
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
220
Rank
110,615
Abstract Views
1,806