Racial Classification in Assisted Reproduction

55 Pages Posted: 11 Jul 2009 Last revised: 4 Aug 2012

Dov Fox

University of San Diego: School of Law

Date Written: July 10, 2009

Abstract

This essay seeks to clarify the moral stakes of reproductive practices that facilitate offspring selection according to race. Egg vendors and sperm banks partition donor catalogs along racial lines to cater to customers who want a child who looks like they do. I ask how we can articulate reluctance to embrace this race-conscious approach. I draw an analogy to a 1964 Supreme Court case striking down a law requiring that each candidate’s race be printed next to his name on the ballot. The “vice” of racialized ballots, the Court held, is not just that they “arouse[]” bigotry, but also that they reinforce a divisive conception of citizenship that race should be “an important, perhaps paramount, consideration” in democratic participation. It is similar, I argue, with donor catalogs: by underscoring race, they credentialize a troubling view that same-race families are preferable to multiracial ones. I distinguish four variously salient ways to disclose donor race and propose choice-structuring mechanisms to balance reproductive privacy, decisional autonomy, and racial identity against the conditions that divide us.

Keywords: race-consciousness, antidiscrimination theory, social meaning, dating websites, donor insemination

JEL Classification: K39, J12, J13, J71, J78, D72, O33, O38

Suggested Citation

Fox, Dov, Racial Classification in Assisted Reproduction (July 10, 2009). 118 YALE L.J. 1844 (2009). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1432666

Dov Fox (Contact Author)

University of San Diego: School of Law ( email )

5998 Alcalá Park
San Diego, CA 92110
United States
(619) 260-4600 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.sandiego.edu/law/news/news_releases/newslist.php?_focus=44957

Paper statistics

Downloads
163
Rank
149,346
Abstract Views
1,462