Not Quite Crisp, Not Yet Fuzzy? Assessing the Potentials and Pitfalls of Multi-Value QCA

Field Methods, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 265-289

COMPASSS Working Paper WP 2007-52

29 Pages Posted: 18 Jul 2009 Last revised: 17 Feb 2014

See all articles by Maarten P. Vink

Maarten P. Vink

Maastricht University - Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences; European University Institute - Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (RSCAS)

Olaf van Vliet

Leiden University - Leiden Law School; Leiden University - Department of Economics

Date Written: 2007

Abstract

This paper assesses the strengths and shortcomings of multi-value Qualitative Comparative Analysis (mvQCA), a comparative technique for small to medium size datasets that has been integrated in the TOSMANA software developed by Lasse Cronqvist. Its main difference with Charles Ragin´s ´crisp-set´ QCA (csQCA), which only allows for conditions with 0 or 1 values, is that the dataset can also contain causal conditions with three or more categories. MvQCA thus avoids relatively crude dichotomization and arguably better captures the richness of information of the raw data. Unlike ´fuzzy-set´ QCA (fsQCA), developed by Ragin to go beyond the classic dichotomous approach, mvQCA is still based on dichotomous outcomes and applies Boolean minimization principles in a similar way to csQCA. Its major advantage, according to its proponents, is that it deals better with the classic QCA problem of contradictory configurations where cases with the same explanatory characteristics display different outcomes and in principle cannot be taken into account for logical minimization. We discuss the logical status of mvQCA, its impact on limited diversity, and present a re-analysis of a recent paper to show how mvQCA uses threshold-setting to solve contradictions.

Keywords: comparative methods, Boolean analysis, multi-value QCA, fuzzy-set methods

Suggested Citation

Vink, Maarten P. and van Vliet, Olaf, Not Quite Crisp, Not Yet Fuzzy? Assessing the Potentials and Pitfalls of Multi-Value QCA (2007). Field Methods, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 265-289; COMPASSS Working Paper WP 2007-52. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1434886

Maarten P. Vink (Contact Author)

Maastricht University - Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences ( email )

P.O. Box 616
Maastricht, 6200 MD
Netherlands

HOME PAGE: http://www.fdcw.unimaas.nl/staff/default.asp?id=215

European University Institute - Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (RSCAS) ( email )

Villa La Fonte, via delle Fontanelle 18
50016 San Domenico di Fiesole
Florence, Florence 50014
Italy

Olaf Van Vliet

Leiden University - Leiden Law School ( email )

Steenschuur 25 PO Box 9520
Leiden, 2300 RA
Netherlands

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.leiden.edu/organisation/taxlawandeconomics/economics/staff/vliet.html

Leiden University - Department of Economics ( email )

P.O. Box 9520
2300 RA Leiden, NL-2300RA
Netherlands

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.leiden.edu/organisation/taxlawandeconomics/economics/staff/vliet.html

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
124
Abstract Views
583
rank
238,833
PlumX Metrics