The Price of Abuse: Intel and the European Commission Decision

GCP: The Online Magazine for Global Competition Policy, No. 2, June 2009

9 Pages Posted: 16 Jul 2009

See all articles by Robert H. Lande

Robert H. Lande

University of Baltimore - School of Law

Date Written: June 1, 2009

Abstract

The May 13, 2009 decision by the European Commission ('EC') holding that Intel violated Article 82 of the Treaty of Rome and should be fined a record amount and prohibited from engaging in certain conduct, set off a predictable four part chorus of denunciations: 1. Intel did nothing wrong and was just competing hard; 2. Intel’s discounts were good for consumers; 3. The entire matter is just another example of Europeans protecting their own against a more efficient U. S. company; and 4. Even if Intel did engage in anticompetitive activity, the fine was much too large. These assertions will be addressed in turn.

Keywords: antitrust, Intel, European Commission, competition policy, EU, anticompetitive, Treaty of Rome, fines, American Antitrust Institute

JEL Classification: K21, K33, L40

Suggested Citation

Lande, Robert H., The Price of Abuse: Intel and the European Commission Decision (June 1, 2009). GCP: The Online Magazine for Global Competition Policy, No. 2, June 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1434985 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1434985

Robert H. Lande (Contact Author)

University of Baltimore - School of Law ( email )

1420 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21218
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
358
Abstract Views
1,632
Rank
144,501
PlumX Metrics