Cost of Capital Estimation in the Current Distressed Environment
Journal of Applied Research in Accounting and Finance (JARAF), Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 31-40, 2009
16 Pages Posted: 17 Jul 2009 Last revised: 10 Aug 2009
Date Written: July 16, 2009
Abstract
The current economic environment has created challenges in estimating the cost of equity capital (“COEC”) and in estimating the appropriate overall cost of capital (i.e., the weighted average cost of capital or “WACC”). Since late 2008, new complications have arisen in estimating the cost of capital. Traditional methods typically employed in estimating the COEC and the WACC are subject to significant estimation and data input problems. This paper attempts to address some of these issues and offers some specific recommendations on dealing with these issues. First, U.S. Treasury bond (“T-bond”) yields, the typical benchmark used in either the Capital Asset Pricing Model (“CAPM”) or the Build-up methods of estimating COEC, were temporarily low for several months, resulting in unreasonably low estimates of COEC as of the important valuation date, December 31, 2008. In the past several weeks T-bond yields have returned to more normal levels. Second, the expected equity risk premium (“ERP”), the rate of return expected on a diversified portfolio of common stocks in excess of the rate of return on an investment in T-bonds, has likely increased as the broad stock market level has declined. Third, because the stock market correction has been heavily concentrated in the financial services sector and in highly leveraged companies, the commonly-employed methods we use for estimating betas, the risk measure in the traditional CAPM, are potentially flawed providing faulty estimates of risk for non-financial and companies with little debt. The result is that at the very time when one assumes a priori that estimates of COEC have increased, the methods we traditionally use to estimate the COEC are providing calculations that imply risk has declined. Fourth, current leverage ratios are likely not sustainable in the long-term for many companies and one needs to consider estimating cost of capital with expected changing capital structures. Fifth, because income subject to income taxes is and will continue to be less than zero for many companies, one cannot automatically use an after-tax cost of debt capital (i.e., multiply the interest rate by one minus the income tax rate) in calculating an appropriate WACC. Sixth, one must always test the resulting cost of capital estimates for reasonableness and not simply apply data or formulas by rote.
Keywords: Cost of Capital, Equity Risk Premium, Beta, Weighted Average cost of Capital
JEL Classification: M40, M41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Equity Premium Consensus Forecast Revisited
By Ivo Welch
-
The Worldwide Equity Premium: A Smaller Puzzle
By Elroy Dimson, Paul Marsh, ...
-
The Market Risk Premium: Expectational Estimates Using Analysts' Forecasts
-
The Equity Risk Premium in 2008: Evidence from the Global CFO Outlook Survey
By John R. Graham and Campbell R. Harvey
-
Equity Risk Premiums (ERP): Determinants, Estimation and Implications
-
The Equity Risk Premium in January 2007: Evidence from the Global Cfo Outlook Survey
By John R. Graham and Campbell R. Harvey
-
Equity Risk Premiums (ERP): Determinants, Estimation and Implications – The 2011 Edition
-
The Equity Risk Premium in January 2006: Evidence from the Global Cfo Outlook Survey
By John R. Graham and Campbell R. Harvey
-
Equity Risk Premiums (ERP): Determinants, Estimation and Implications - The 2010 Edition
-
Equity Risk Premiums (ERP): Determinants, Estimation and Implications – The 2012 Edition