Why a Duck? Are Feminist Legal Journals an Endangered Species, and if so, are They Worth Saving?

Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, Vol. 12, p. 478, 2003

7 Pages Posted: 23 Jul 2009

Date Written: 2003

Abstract

This Essay is part of a symposium about whether feminist law journals have outlived their usefulness given that feminist legal scholarship is now published in mainstream law journals. It suggests that that these journals play a valuable role in scholarship for at least two reasons. First, feminist legal scholarship is still underrepresented in journals, especially top tier ones. Second, even if this type of scholarship were adequately represented, feminist journals like all specialty journals, serve a purpose. Criminal law journals, for example, provide a forum for experts in the field, allowing scholars to develop and explore issues more deeply than a general readership review can do. Similarly, feminist legal journals promote the development of feminist theory and practice.

Keywords: Legal scholarship, feminist, law review

Suggested Citation

Kornhauser, Marjorie E., Why a Duck? Are Feminist Legal Journals an Endangered Species, and if so, are They Worth Saving? (2003). Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, Vol. 12, p. 478, 2003, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1438153

Marjorie E. Kornhauser (Contact Author)

Tulane University School of Law ( email )

6329 Freret Street
New Orleans, LA 70118
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
13
Abstract Views
365
PlumX Metrics