The 'Design Sciences' and Constitutional Success

Texas Law Review, Vol. 87, pp. 1339-1374, 2009

36 Pages Posted: 27 Jul 2009

Date Written: July 26, 2009

Abstract

In this article, I engage in a brief thought experiment concerning two important yet not often-addressed aspects of constitutional-design theory. First, I place constitutional design in the broader context of what I call the 'design sciences' — the many disciplines, domains, and activities from urban planning to space exploration — that rely on design to accomplish big, noble goals. Second, I address the question of 'success' in constitutional design, namely how to define and assess the actual impact of constitutional structures in accomplishing desirable objectives. Among the possible criteria I examine are time horizon and endurance; actual implementation of constitutional aspirations; constitutional design’s contribution in accomplishing substantive goals such as democracy, prosperity, and human development; the real success rate of constitutions in mitigating existential tensions in conflict or post-conflict settings; and the (in)ability of constitutions to address some of the world’s biggest challenges, from health pandemics or climate change to widening social and economic gaps, forced migration, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, or persisting large scale crimes against humanity — all of which require global cooperation and therefore lie largely beyond the reach of constitutions.

Keywords: constitutional design, constitutional engineering, comparative constitutional law

Suggested Citation

Hirschl, Ran, The 'Design Sciences' and Constitutional Success (July 26, 2009). Texas Law Review, Vol. 87, pp. 1339-1374, 2009 . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1439356

Ran Hirschl (Contact Author)

University of Toronto ( email )

78 Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C5
Canada

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
368
Abstract Views
1,252
rank
79,738
PlumX Metrics