The Law of Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Establishing Researchers' Duties
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 361-383, 2008
23 Pages Posted: 30 Jun 2010 Last revised: 25 Dec 2010
Date Written: July 27, 2009
Abstract
Research technologies can now produce so much information that there is significant potential for incidental findings (IFs). hese are findings generated in research that are beyond the aims of the study. Current law and federal regulations offer no direct guidance on how to deal with IFs in research, nor is there adequate professional or institutional guidance. We advocate a defined set of researcher duties based on law and ethics and recommend a pathway to be followed in handling IFs in research. This article traces the underlying ethical and legal theories supporting researcher duties to manage IFs, including duties to develop a plan for management in the research protocol, to discuss the possibility of and management plan for IFs in the informed consent process, and to address, evaluate, and ultimately offer to disclose IFs of potential clinical or reproductive significance to research participants when they arise.
Keywords: incidental findings, genetics, research, informed consent, disclosure of results, law, ethics
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Law and Neuroscience (2d ed. 2021)
By Owen D. Jones, Jeffrey D. Schall, ...
-
By Owen D. Jones, Rene Marois, ...
-
Danger at the Edge of Chaos: Predicting Violent Behavior in a Post-Daubert World
-
Letting Katz Out of the Bag: Cognitive Freedom and Fourth Amendment Fidelity
-
Violence on the Brain: A Critique of Neuroscience in Criminal Law
-
Brain Imaging and the Bill of Rights
By Dov Fox
-
By Douglas A. Berman and Stephanos Bibas
-
The Disordered and Discredited Plaintiff: Psychiatric Evidence in Civil Litigation