Theoretical Inquiries in Law, Vol. 10, No. 2, Article 13, 2009
48 Pages Posted: 29 Jul 2009
Date Written: July 29, 2009
Following independence in 1948, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem founded a law faculty and modeled it on the European example (Continental and British). Today, the Israeli law faculty is much more similar to the U.S. law school than to institutions of legal education in Europe. This Article traces the history of the changes in Israeli legal education. It argues that the shift began after 1967, faced resistance in the 1980s, and gained momentum in the 1990s. Presently we may be witnessing the beginning of a shift away from U.S. influence and back to Continental Europe or even Asia. The Article discusses three major educational components, which together signaled the shift to U.S. influence: a student-run law review, curricular reform, and open and lively class discussion. The Article then offers several factors to explain the shift: judicial opinions that began to rely on American decisional law, the adoption of the U.S. model of practice by the legal profession, the privatization of law schools, globalization, and Americanization and foreign affairs. Finally, the Article considers the contribution to Americanization made by active U.S. attempts to export American law to other legal systems.
Keywords: legal education, comparative law, American influence on Israeli legal education, student-run law reviews, curricular reform, open class discussion, American decisional law, U.S. model of legal practice, exportation of American law to other legal systems
JEL Classification: K19, K39
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Lahav, Pnina, American Moment[s]: When, How, and Why Did Israeli Law Faculties Come to Resemble Elite U.S. Law Schools? (July 29, 2009). Theoretical Inquiries in Law, Vol. 10, No. 2, Article 13, 2009; Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 09-32. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1440864