26 Pages Posted: 31 Jul 2009 Last revised: 29 Sep 2011
Date Written: July 31, 2009
This paper explores the influence of social categories on the perceived trade-off between relatively bad but equal distribution of resources between two parties and profit maximizing, yet asymmetric payoffs. Study 1 and 2 showed that people prefer to maximize profits when interacting within their social category, but chose suboptimal individual and joint profits when interacting across social categories. Study 3 demonstrated that outside observers, who were not members of the focal social categories, also were less likely to maximize profits when resources were distributed across social category lines. Study 4 showed that the transaction utility of maximizing profits required greater compensation when resources were distributed across, in contrast to within social categories. We discuss the ethical implications of these decision making biases in the context of organizations.
Keywords: Profit Maximization, Choice, Decision Making, Social Categories, Transaction Utility, Ethical Dilemmas
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Garcia, Stephen M. and Bazerman, Max H. and Kopelman, Shirli and Tor, Avishalom and Miller, Dale T., The Price of Equality: Suboptimal Resource Allocations Across Social Categories (July 31, 2009). Harvard PON Working Paper No. 1442078. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1442078 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1442078