What Rough Beast Slouches Towards Bethlehem: Business Roundtable V. SEC and the SEC's Delegated Rulemaking Authority

Annual Review Banking & Finance Law, Vol. 25, p. 497, 2006

40 Pages Posted: 7 Aug 2009

Date Written: 2006

Abstract

In the summer of 1990, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia issued Business Roundtable v. SEC,3 invalidating SEC Rule 19c-4 as outside of the Agency’s rulemaking authority.4 Business Roundtable was notable when handed down because the decision took place during a pro-regulatory period in which an activist SEC was accustomed to courts sustaining its rules.5 Currently, however, the atmosphere in the public law area has changed, and courts have held the SEC to a textualist interpretation of its authorizing statutes. This trend is most noticeable with respect to private enforcement of the securities laws,6 but other developments suggest that the SEC’s ability to promulgate ultra vires rules has also narrowed. This shift in the legal landscape has made Business Roundtable a 'case whose time has come.'

Suggested Citation

Kirshner, Jodie A., What Rough Beast Slouches Towards Bethlehem: Business Roundtable V. SEC and the SEC's Delegated Rulemaking Authority (2006). Annual Review Banking & Finance Law, Vol. 25, p. 497, 2006, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1443358

Jodie A. Kirshner (Contact Author)

University of Cambridge ( email )

Cambridge, CB3 0DS
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
39
Abstract Views
445
PlumX Metrics