Of Maternal State and Minimalist Judiciary: The Indian Supreme Court's Approach to Terror-Related Adjudication

National Law School of India Review, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2009

24 Pages Posted: 8 Aug 2009

See all articles by Mrinal Satish

Mrinal Satish

National Law University, Delhi

Aparna Chandra

National Law University Delhi

Date Written: April 30, 2009

Abstract

This article uses Supreme Court jurisprudence in terror-related offences to examine what the role of a court in a constitutional democracy should be. The authors first examine the theory of judicial minimalism. Then, based on the contrast between two sets of Supreme Court decisions -decisions in terror-related cases (where national security is pitted against civil liberties) and decisions related to fundamental right in general - the authors make two arguments. First, that the Supreme Court has been inconsistent in its treatment of these two categories of cases - it has employed the minimalist approach in terror-related cases while adopting a less deferential approach in general Fundamental Rights adjudication. Second, that doing so, the Indian Supreme Court has been inconsistent and abdicated its responsibility.

Keywords: Minimalism, terror, POTA, TADA, India, Supreme Court

Suggested Citation

Satish, Mrinal and Chandra, Aparna, Of Maternal State and Minimalist Judiciary: The Indian Supreme Court's Approach to Terror-Related Adjudication (April 30, 2009). National Law School of India Review, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1445283

Mrinal Satish

National Law University, Delhi ( email )

Sector- 14, Dwarka
Dwarka
New Delhi, Delhi 110078
India

Aparna Chandra (Contact Author)

National Law University Delhi ( email )

Sector 14
Dwarka
New Delhi, Delhi 110078
India

HOME PAGE: http://nludelhi.ac.in/pep-fac-new-pro.aspx?Id=45

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
208
Abstract Views
1,578
rank
145,339
PlumX Metrics