Assessing the Argument for Specialized Courts: Evidence from Family Courts in Spain

International Journal of Law, Policy & Family, Forthcoming

University of Illinois Law & Economics Research Paper No. LE09-022

21 Pages Posted: 12 Aug 2009 Last revised: 13 Aug 2009

See all articles by Nuno Garoupa

Nuno Garoupa

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School, Faculty

Natalia Jorgensen

Foundation for Applied Economic Research (FEDEA)

Pablo Vazquez

Foundation for Applied Economic Research (FEDEA)

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: August 10, 2009

Abstract

Specialized courts have become a key component of the legal reform packages implemented in civil law countries, particularly, in the area of family law. One argument for this policy is that they are able to reach a decision faster than the regular courts, which are normally congested. We use data from a survey of Spanish family courts in the region of Madrid to test this claim. After controlling for other relevant variables, the econometric results did not provide strong support for specialized courts.

Suggested Citation

Garoupa, Nuno and Jorgensen, Natalia and Vazquez, Pablo, Assessing the Argument for Specialized Courts: Evidence from Family Courts in Spain (August 10, 2009). International Journal of Law, Policy & Family, Forthcoming; University of Illinois Law & Economics Research Paper No. LE09-022. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1446875

Nuno Garoupa (Contact Author)

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School, Faculty ( email )

3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States

Natalia Jorgensen

Foundation for Applied Economic Research (FEDEA) ( email )

Jorge Juan 46
Madrid, 28001
Spain

Pablo Vazquez

Foundation for Applied Economic Research (FEDEA) ( email )

Spain

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
67
rank
331,059
Abstract Views
963
PlumX Metrics