Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=1447470
 


 



You Can't Always Get What You Want...: Presidential Elections and Supreme Court Appointments


Paul Finkelman


University of Pittsburgh, School of Law; Albany Law School - Government Law Center

2000

Tulsa Law Review, Vol. 35, No. 3 & 4, 2000

Abstract:     
In this article, Professor Finkelman discusses the process of Supreme Court appointments in light of the 2000 Presidential election. As Supreme Court appointments are for an unlimited period of years, those Presidents who have the opportunity to make judicial appointments are able to shape the bench for years after their own terms have ended. However, Professor Finkelman notes that not all appointees turn out in the way a President may have hoped. For example, President Franklin D. Roosevelt likely did not anticipate that Justice Felix Frankfurter would emerge as one of the most conservative justices of his era. With this in mind, Supreme Court appointments are an important factor in presidential elections.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 11

Keywords: supreme court appointments, presidental elections


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 13, 2009  

Suggested Citation

Finkelman, Paul, You Can't Always Get What You Want...: Presidential Elections and Supreme Court Appointments (2000). Tulsa Law Review, Vol. 35, No. 3 & 4, 2000. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1447470

Contact Information

Paul Finkelman (Contact Author)
University of Pittsburgh, School of Law ( email )
3900 Forbes Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States
412-648-2079 (Phone)

Albany Law School - Government Law Center ( email )
80 New Scotland Avenue
Albany, NY 12208
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 496
Downloads: 32