Providing Managerial Incentives: Cash Flows Versus Accrual Accounting
43 Pages Posted: 8 Jan 1999
There are 2 versions of this paper
Providing Managerial Incentives: Cash Flows Versus Accrual Accounting
Abstract
This paper examines a multi-period agency model in which a manager makes investment decisions in each period. Performance measures based only on realized cash flows are essentially uninformative about value creation at any intermediate point in time. If the principal has access to additional project information which allows for a proper matching of a project's periodic cash flows with a share of the original investment cost, then the value created by the manager can be assessed at intermediate points in time. Such matching can be achieved by means of an accrual accounting system with properly structured depreciation charges. We establish that performance evaluation based on accrual accounting data results in lower agency costs than performance evaluation based on realized cash flows only.
JEL Classification: G31, G32, M40, M46
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Accrual-Based Compensation, Depreciation and Investment Decisions
-
Controlling Investment Decisions: Depreciation- and Capital Charges
-
Revenue Recognition in a Multiperiod Agency Setting
By Sunil Dutta and Xiao-jun Zhang
-
Incentives for Efficient Inventory Management: The Role of Historical Cost
-
Leading Indicator Variables, Performance Measurement and Long-Term Versus Short-Term Contracts
-
Delegated Investment Decisions and Private Benefits of Control