International Sanctions Against Individuals: A Test Case for the Resilience of the European Union’s Constitutional Foundations

European Public Law Journal, Vol. 15, pp. 351–378, 2009

Posted: 14 Aug 2009 Last revised: 30 Jun 2012

See all articles by Christina Eckes

Christina Eckes

Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance

Date Written: August 1, 2009

Abstract

Most recently, restrictive measures adopted against private individuals have stirred up a lot of controversy. Essentially, these measures identify natural and legal persons as terrorist suspects, freeze their assets, and impose travel bans against them. On the one hand, sanctions against individuals are considered to be more advanced than trade embargoes against states. Although they pursue the same aim of maintaining international peace and security, they do not indistinctly restrict the rights of whole populations. On the other hand, sanctions against individuals are adopted pursuant to essentially the same procedures as sanctions against states. Consequently, they are heavily criticized for disregarding well-established procedural rights. Certainly, individual sanctions are an illustrative example of how ‘global governance’ dealing with de-territorialized problems of today’s world directly impacts on the rights of individuals.

Journal available online.

Keywords: cases of Kadi and al Barakaat, individual sanctions, United Nations, legal basis, Articles 301 EC

Suggested Citation

Eckes, Christina, International Sanctions Against Individuals: A Test Case for the Resilience of the European Union’s Constitutional Foundations (August 1, 2009). European Public Law Journal, Vol. 15, pp. 351–378, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1448602

Christina Eckes (Contact Author)

Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance ( email )

Oudemanhuispoort 4-6
1012 CN Amsterdam
Netherlands

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
459
PlumX Metrics