Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Getting Past the Prisoners' Dilemma: Transparency and Accountability Reforms to Improve New York's Industrial Development Agencies

19 Pages Posted: 14 Aug 2009  

Amy Lavine

Albany Law School

Date Written: August, 13 2009

Abstract

This paper discusses the pros and cons of New York's Industrial Development Agencies (IDAs), which offer economic development subsidies to attract and retain businesses. IDA reform has become an important public policy issue, and the paper explores some of the reforms that have been proposed, including measures that would: increase monitoring and reporting requirements; make the subsidy award process more objective; increase public participation; heighten ethics requirements for IDA boards; impose penalties for subsidy abuse; make IDAs more accountable to school districts and local governments; and that would improve the environmental and social qualities of IDA projects. The paper concludes that many reforms are warranted, and it suggests that reform supporters should prioritize these accountability and transparency measures. Controversial reforms, such as increased wage requirements and clawbacks, should be modified so as to make them more acceptable to business interests. Compromise proposals might rely on incentives rather than mandates, or include sufficient exceptions.

Keywords: economic development, subsidies, tax exemption, accountability, transparency, public finance

Suggested Citation

Lavine, Amy, Getting Past the Prisoners' Dilemma: Transparency and Accountability Reforms to Improve New York's Industrial Development Agencies (August, 13 2009). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1448745 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1448745

Amy Lavine (Contact Author)

Albany Law School ( email )

80 New Scotland Avenue
Albany, NY 12208
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
69
Rank
282,171
Abstract Views
549