Political Cost Incentives for Managing the Property-Liability Insurer Loss Reserve
Journal of Accounting Research, Forthcoming
38 Pages Posted: 15 Aug 2009 Last revised: 21 Sep 2009
Date Written: September 15, 2009
Abstract
This paper examines the effect of rate regulation on the management of the property-liability insurer loss reserve. The political cost hypothesis predicts that managers make accounting choices to reduce wealth transfers resulting from the regulatory process. Managers may under-state reserves to justify lower rates to regulators. Alternatively, managers may have an incentive to report loss inflating discretionary reserves to reduce the cost of regulatory rate suppression. We find insurers over-state reserves in the presence of stringent rate regulation. Investigating the impact along the conditional reserve error distribution, we discover that a majority of the response occurs from under-reserving firms under-reserving less because of stringent rate regulation.
Keywords: discretionary accruals, insurance, regulation, quantile regression
JEL Classification: M41, G18, G22, G32, H25
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Conglomeration Versus Strategic Focus: Evidence from the Insurance Industry
By Allen N. Berger, J David Cummins, ...
-
By J David Cummins and Mary A. Weiss
-
The Integration of the Financial Services Industry: Where are the Efficiencies?
-
Deregulation, Consolidation, and Efficiency: Evidence from the Spanish Insurance Industry
By J David Cummins and María Rubio-misas
-
By J David Cummins and Xiaoying Xie
-
The Capital Structure of Firms Subject to Price Regulation: Evidence from the Insurance Industry
By Robert W. Klein, Richard D. Phillips, ...
-
Effects of Regulation on Utility Financing: Theory and Evidence