19 Pages Posted: 15 Aug 2009
Date Written: August 13, 2009
A 2004 study of the results of stock trading by United States Senators during the 1990s found that that senators on average beat the market by 12% a year. In sharp contrast, U.S. households on average underperformed the market by 1.4% a year and even corporate insiders on average beat the market by only about 6% a year during that period. A reasonable inference is that some Senators had access to - and were using - material nonpublic information about the companies in whose stock they trade.
Under current law, it is uncertain whether members of Congress can be held liable for insider trading. The proposed Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act addresses that problem by instructing the Securities and Exchange Commission to adopt rules intended to prohibit such trading.
This article analyzes present law to determine whether members of Congress, Congressional employees, and other federal government employees can be held liable for trading on the basis of material nonpublic information. It argues that there is no public policy rationale for permitting such trading and that doing so creates perverse legislative incentives and opens the door to corruption. The article explains that the Speech and Debate Clause of the U.S. Constitution is no barrier to legislative and regulatory restrictions on Congressional insider trading. Finally, the article critiques the current version of the STOCK Act, proposing several improvements.
Keywords: insider trading, Congress
JEL Classification: K22
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Bainbridge, Stephen M., The Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act (August 13, 2009). UCLA School of Law, Law-Economics Research Paper No. 09-16. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1449744 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1449744